After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures across Europe, fresh technologies are now reviving these types of systems. From lie recognition tools tested at the border to a program for confirming documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of technology is being utilized in asylum applications. This article is exploring how these technologies have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. It reveals just how asylum seekers are transformed into obligated hindered techno-users: They are asked to conform to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps also to keep up with capricious tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This obstructs their particular capacity to steer these devices and to pursue their right for safeguard.

It also illustrates how these technologies will be embedded in refugee governance: They aid the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of distributed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering them from interacting with the programs of proper protection. It further argues that analyses of securitization and victimization should be coupled with an insight into the disciplinary mechanisms of them technologies, through which migrants will be turned into data-generating subjects who all are disciplined by their reliance on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal understanding, the article states that these solutions have an natural obstructiveness. They have a double effect: whilst they assist to expedite the asylum method, they also make it difficult just for refugees to navigate these kinds of systems. They are positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions of non-governmental celebrities, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their situations. Moreover, they pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in inaccurate or discriminatory outcomes.

Share This
Right Menu Icon